1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Where's the discussion about Hillary's email server or the Clinton's foundation?

Discussion in '2016 Election' started by Greg, Apr 25, 2015.

  1. Greg

    Greg Full Member

    Sorry folks, I don't have an article to hang this post on, but knowing this forum I am surprised we aren't discussing how Hillary wiped her email server (who else in the whole government uses their own private MX instead of a government email address) and what about the Uranium mine sold to Russia and the contributions to the Clinton Foundation......

    Why aren't we discussing this? Fox News is all over it like ants on molasses.

    Is Fox so far out there to the right that they are totally discounted by America? Or are conservatives just staying at home and keeping mum?

    For the record, I work at home and run Fox all day, turning off mute when something interesting comes up. I'm certifiable.
  2. Andy


    What's to discuss?

    Another year, another Clinton scandal, you can almost set your calendar by them

    the Liberal MSM won't talk about it since 60% of them are already in the bag for her due to...
    1. She's a woman
    2. She's a Clinton.
    3. Why do you hate women you misogynist pig?

    Meanwhile they're also waaaay too busy tripping over themselves trying to get "GOTCHA" questions thought up about how Ted Cruz feels about the color yellow or the scent lilac.
  3. SixofNine

    SixofNine Jedi Sage Staff Member

    It stinks to high heaven.

    Lots of "coincidences," e.g., Bill Clinton has made 13 speeches for which he was paid at least $500,000. Eleven of those speeches took place after Hillary became Secretary of State.

    It must be bad when the Clinton side has to send bottom feeder Lanny Davis to Fox News Sunday.
  4. Copzilla

    Copzilla dangerous animal Staff Member

    They're birds of a feather. The liberals do. not. care.

    They're just fine with rampant corruption, so long as it fuels the ever forward march to complete socialism.
  5. Greg

    Greg Full Member

    I'm happy. Now at least the discussion is on the table.

    It never ceases to amaze me how much the Clintons get away with. It's like they're teflon.

    Just wiping the email server alone, let alone not using a government server for presumably highly classified emails, makes me wonder what is going on. What other government official could get away with that? Yet Obama controls the prosecutors, and I'm sure he put the word in to leave it alone.

    Then there's the foundation and the uranium scandal. Too much coincidence to for anybody but a liberal to believe. That uranium corporation controls 1/5 of our uranium production in the US, or at least that's what is being said. While Russia must receive an export permit to take it outside of the US from the NRC, who controls the NRC? I hope at least somebody will scream to holy hell if RU tries to remove any uranium either ore or refined from the US.

    This is just crazy, our enemy having at least the appearance of controlling 20% of this nuclear weapons material. I'm not seriously worried they will actually attempt to remove any uranium because like I said they need a permit from the NRC, and I hope the NRC would just say "no, and if you don't like it then sell your interest to an American corporation." And we can always seize the mines under eminent domain and tell them tough shit, it' owned by the US government now. (We'd have to pay them fair compensation.)w

    But why would anybody even take a chance on this???

    We have about 18 months before the election and the way Hillary has been doing recently it's been a scandal a month or something like that, I'm sure there will be plenty more in the upcoming months. I hear also that her positive ratings within liberals are going down, and negatives up.

    Another thing I heard is that America is tired of dynasties: Bush vs. Clinton yet again. Of course I heard this on either Fox or on Hannity's radio show. I should admit I'm pretty far to the conservative end, but then this entire forum leans conservative so I'm in good company.

    One interesting thing pointed out though, right now the Democrats have a one trick pony: Hillary. If not Hillary then who? Biden? LOLOL! Most Americans couldn't even tell you the name of the Vice President. Yet the Republicans have a very healthy flock of well qualified contenders.

    I think I already mentioned the problems between Hillary and Obama, if she gets too far away from his policies she risks losing his support, too near and she risks becoming Obama II. That's going to be a cute trick for her to find a balance that she doesn't have to run on his platform yet still retain his support. I have the popcorn ready for this one! :)

    By the way, I heard the vast majority of the foundation's donations go to overhead (85%?) and very little to grants. It seems clear the foundation is just a funding vehicle for the Clintons.
  6. SixofNine

    SixofNine Jedi Sage Staff Member

    When President Obama appointed Hillary secretary of state, his administration insisted that she and the Clinton Foundation agree, via a Memorandum of Understanding, to safeguards involving disclosure and official approval of foreign contributions to the foundation.

    From the Daily Caller:

    Basically, they were taking the Clintons' word that all donations would be disclosed.

    Peggy Noonan had a great observation about why the Clintons get away with this: "They are protected from charges of corruption by their reputation for corruption. "

  7. Greg

    Greg Full Member

    If you take the Clintons' word for anything, then you surely won't mind if I masturbate and ejaculate into your open hand. That is what the Clintons are doing to the liberals.

    Billary is really a piece of work. Not in a good sense. Fucking idiots have taken over the government, and we who have brains are just along for the ride.

Share This Page