First off, let me say that I have no sympathy for this jerk. As far as I'm concerned, well, let's just say I agree with the implication the woman makes in the very last paragraph of the article. But you know, isn't this like kicking a dog, or something? This guy is a miserable you-know-what and doesn't deserve anything <u>better</u> than lifetime incarceration, but what purpose does it serve, hounding him like this? How naive to think this sort of treatment will keep him from offending again. Given the incredibly high recidivism rate of sexual offenders, should the "model" of rehabilitation be tossed out and the concept of permanent incarceration for public safety purposes be imposed?