PDA

View Full Version : Why Less Brilliant Presidents Do Better


ethics
06-18-2007, 08:37 PM
Nothing WE didn't know already but nice to see our theories validated.

The most intelligent presidents in U.S. history haven’t been the sharpest tools in the shed and their brain power might be the culprit. Intelligence actually can be a disadvantage in positions of authority, says Mr. Posner on his blog (http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/), which he co-writes with economist Gary Becker. “Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan were not as bright as Herbert Hoover, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton,” he says, but nevertheless were better presidents.

Especially intelligent people also have difficulty trusting the intuitions of less-articulate people who have more experience than they do. That might be why many smart senior officials in government have tried to reason their way through problems on their own, assuming their civil servants’ inadequate explanations rendered their judgments invalid.

Steve
06-18-2007, 08:43 PM
How, precisely, did he determine that, say, Roosevelt wasn't as "smart" as Clinton?

And if you cite IQ tests I'm going to drive to Brooklyn and smack you upside the head! :)

damonlab
06-19-2007, 02:46 AM
I guess that would make the current administration the exception to the rule.

Swamp Fox
06-19-2007, 10:32 PM
There's substantial evidence to show that performance in school is no indicator of success in life, and I seem to remember reading some studies that show that high IQ is no indicator of success either.

That's something to think about, isn't it?

Hookah | Mortgage Calculator | Loans | Bad Credit Loan | Credit Counseling