ditch
04-05-2007, 07:41 AM
The parents of a severely disabled 28 year old who admitted killing him "to end his misery" left court yesterday without being gaoled for their crime.
Blind from birth and largely deaf, Matthew had the mental age of a child aged three or four.
His parents killed him in April 2001, the day before he was to undergo surgery for an ear infection that would likely have robbed him of his remaining hearing, sense of taste and limited powers of speech.
The method of killing the father used has not been revealed.
While I can sympathise with the parents plight, killing their son wasn't the way out of this. I also can believe their claims that they loved their son despite killing him. But, there has to be another way doesn't there? Or is society not able to appropriately deal with these rare situations in a way that offers a practical solution for those concerned?
More details from the SMH. (http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/suffering-wont-end-for-mercy-killers/2007/04/05/1175366370242.html)
Blind from birth and largely deaf, Matthew had the mental age of a child aged three or four.
His parents killed him in April 2001, the day before he was to undergo surgery for an ear infection that would likely have robbed him of his remaining hearing, sense of taste and limited powers of speech.
The method of killing the father used has not been revealed.
While I can sympathise with the parents plight, killing their son wasn't the way out of this. I also can believe their claims that they loved their son despite killing him. But, there has to be another way doesn't there? Or is society not able to appropriately deal with these rare situations in a way that offers a practical solution for those concerned?
More details from the SMH. (http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/suffering-wont-end-for-mercy-killers/2007/04/05/1175366370242.html)