ethics
02-22-2005, 11:16 AM
The other day I was reading one of my favorite columnist in NY Times, Thomas Friedman. Friedman, as of late, is not on the mark but I still read him. Anyway, last time I was reading him, I felt that I was reading another blog and it occurred to me, why would I want to subscribe to a paper when you have a wealth of blogs out there?
The Washington Post reports that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37138-2005Feb19.html">newspapers are struggling.
</a>
"Print is dead," Sports Illustrated President John Squires told a room full of newspaper and magazine circulation executives at a conference in Toronto in November. His advice? "Get over it," meaning publishers should stop trying to save their ink-on-paper product and focus on electronic delivery of their journalism.
The Post provides statistical evidence of the drop in newspaper mindshare. It looks at the percent of people reading a newspaper in daily in 1967 and in 2004, broken down by age group.
Age Group 1967 readership rate 2004 readership rate
18-24 70.8 39.0
25-34 72.7 38.8
35-54 81.0 53.0
55+ 75.5 67.4
The Washington Post reports that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37138-2005Feb19.html">newspapers are struggling.
</a>
"Print is dead," Sports Illustrated President John Squires told a room full of newspaper and magazine circulation executives at a conference in Toronto in November. His advice? "Get over it," meaning publishers should stop trying to save their ink-on-paper product and focus on electronic delivery of their journalism.
The Post provides statistical evidence of the drop in newspaper mindshare. It looks at the percent of people reading a newspaper in daily in 1967 and in 2004, broken down by age group.
Age Group 1967 readership rate 2004 readership rate
18-24 70.8 39.0
25-34 72.7 38.8
35-54 81.0 53.0
55+ 75.5 67.4