ethics
02-10-2005, 10:50 AM
People perceived as the most likely to succeed might also be the most likely to crumble under pressure. A <a href="http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/050209_under_pressure.html">new study</a> finds that individuals with high working-memory capacity, which normally allows them to excel, crack under pressure and do worse on simple exams than when allowed to work with no constraints. Those with less capacity score low, too, but they tend not to be affected by pressure.
I was never a fan of tests (unless it was a physical one) and this is the biggest reason why:
Since working memory is known to predict many higher-level brain functions, the research calls into question the ability of high-pressure tests such as the SAT, GRE, LSAT, and MCAT to accurately gauge who will succeed in future academic endeavors.
Meaning that the ones that score the highest on tests are not necessarily the smartest, the best.
I was never a fan of tests (unless it was a physical one) and this is the biggest reason why:
Since working memory is known to predict many higher-level brain functions, the research calls into question the ability of high-pressure tests such as the SAT, GRE, LSAT, and MCAT to accurately gauge who will succeed in future academic endeavors.
Meaning that the ones that score the highest on tests are not necessarily the smartest, the best.