Steve
02-02-2005, 08:02 PM
Something about this (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6901581/) doesn't make sense to me. Why would the evolutionary process result in creatures for which an excess of oxygen is deadly?
There are arguments and evidence that, hundreds of millions of years ago, if not more, the earth's atmosphere was greatly lacking in oxygen. I can see organisms developing in such an environment where their metabolism would require very little, if any, oxygen.
But that was hundreds of millions of years ago. Surely evolution would have selected for insect species that can handle the normal oxygen levels present in the atmosphere. After all, every other living thing, except anaerobic bacteria, have no troubles with oxygen levels. It makes no sense that insects would.
There are arguments and evidence that, hundreds of millions of years ago, if not more, the earth's atmosphere was greatly lacking in oxygen. I can see organisms developing in such an environment where their metabolism would require very little, if any, oxygen.
But that was hundreds of millions of years ago. Surely evolution would have selected for insect species that can handle the normal oxygen levels present in the atmosphere. After all, every other living thing, except anaerobic bacteria, have no troubles with oxygen levels. It makes no sense that insects would.